[OSM-talk] collection/street relation: which one to use?
Anthony
osm at inbox.org
Wed Aug 18 17:55:58 BST 2010
They both (street and collection) have problems. type=street is the
best type. role=member (or no role) would be the best role.
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Pieren <pieren3 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Since "associatedStreet" was historicaly the first proposal including house
> numbers and is the most popular according to Tagwatch, I would suggest to
> deprecate the "street" proposal and remove streets from the "collection"
> proposal.
According to the wiki, associatedStreet only allows one occurrence of
the street role, and that member has to be a way. So should we allow
associatedStreet include a street relation under the street role, or
should we allow it to contain multiple ways? Given the name, probably
the former.
More information about the talk
mailing list