[OSM-talk] Culvert and average contributor

[Jukka Rahkonen]

Pieren <pieren3 <at> gmail.com> writes:

> 
> It seems that culvert=yes is ambiguous. It can be a ford or applied on the
road. I'm also in favour to replace culvert=yes by tunnel=culvert,
bridge=culvert or ford=culvertIt has also the advantage of simplifying the tag
management in applications (can just handle tunnel=* or bridge=* or ford=*).
> Pieren

And it can also be considered how ofter culvert is needed.  Normally, if a 
ditchcrosses a way it does it through a culvert, at least here in Finland,
and everybody knows it without splitting the waterway and adding culverts 
or layer definitions etc. But for sure there are culverts which are worth 
having their own tags.