[OSM-talk] [Tagging] Culvert and average contributor

[M∡rtin Koppenhoefer]

2010/8/27 Pieren <pieren3 at gmail.com>:

> But nobody is replying to my suggestion : is it okay to replace culvert=yes
> but a tunnel=culvert (or tunnel=sewel)(or bridge=culvert on the highway when
> it happens that the structure is directly used as a bridge) in the wiki ?


I already replied: tunnel=culvert is fine for me. I guess you intented
tunnel=sewer. Might be OK as well, but depends on the size.
bridge=culvert instead I don't like. You will already have this
information on the waterway, what is the purpose of tagging it on the
way above?

cheers,
Martin