[OSM-talk] Community vs. Licensing

[Nathan Edgars II]

Chris Browet wrote:
> 
> As far as I understand the licenses, nobody is permitted to fork the OSM
> data without permissions, and it is thus not truly "open":
> 
cc-by-sa (and almost? every viral license) allows for forking as long as
said fork is under the same license. Note the number of Wikipedia forks and
mirrors: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mirrors_and_forks
-- 
View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Community-vs-Licensing-tp5475468p5477534.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.