[OSM-talk] Community vs. Licensing

[Richard Fairhurst]

Russ Nelson wrote:
> Second, because it will do minimum damage to the
> community (the discussion here is evidence that the community 
> WILL be badly harmed by relicensing).

We'll lose people whichever way it goes.

I guess, for example, that Etienne might not contribute to an ODbL-licensed
OSM.

Similarly, if OSM decides to stay with CC-BY-SA, I will leave the project.

That's why forks are good: people can choose to contribute to the project
that most closely fits their beliefs.

Richard 
-- 
View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Community-vs-Licensing-tp5475468p5479454.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.