[OSM-talk] Community vs. Licensing

Dirk-Lüder Kreie osm-list at deelkar.net
Tue Aug 31 12:35:01 BST 2010


Am 31.08.2010 10:35, schrieb Florian Lohoff:
> Its about the new complexity - I am not against ODBL+CT + whatever per se.
> It might be the better solution - although its much more complex as we
> see - I would like the new license to be much simpler than before and i am
> willing to pay to "price" of Share-Alikeness and other "protecting" elements.

I agree, but...

> I'd rather say - make it PD and lets continue mapping - Its not about
> licenses but rather about community. 

I very much agree.

> I'll not relicense as it stands today as thats the only time i am beeing
> asked about relicensing and the license - so the only choice i have
> is to refuse relicensing now ...

... I rather accept the new license, assuming the lawyers and the LWG
know what they're doing.

Besides the CT open a way to PD, which is also incentive to accept them.
(And a source of problems where incompatible imports happened).

-- 
Dirk-Lüder "Deelkar" Kreie
Bremen - 53.0901°N 8.7868°E

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20100831/87780214/attachment.pgp>


More information about the talk mailing list