[OSM-talk] How Can OSMF convince me to accept the New CT and ODBL

Elizabeth Dodd edodd at billiau.net
Thu Dec 9 08:39:40 GMT 2010


On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:34:27 +0100
Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:

> Gert,
> 
> > Article 3 is to me the problem:
> 
> The legal-talk list would be a good place to discuss the wording of
> the Contributor Terms.
> 
> Bye
> Frederik
> 

Perhaps more than a quick read would be more beneficial.

Gert wants OSMF to align "open and free" with a formal definition used
by a respected organisation specialising in "open and free" licences /
software / data.

Gert wants OSMF to sort out the differing statements concerning "not
wanting to own the copyright of the data" and demanding that they have
the copyright.

They are not 'legal matters' but matters of principle which need to be
sorted out.



More information about the talk mailing list