[OSM-talk] Massive import of airports

ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen g.gremmen at cetest.nl
Fri Dec 17 12:08:49 GMT 2010


OSM is an open system.

Anyone can contribute as he likes.

If there is something wrong then you cannot say "must be reverted"

It's the original author that should be convinced to revert data.

Only none cooperative authors should "have their date reverted"

 

All OSM-ers are equal, nor Pieren nor Frederik are more equal.

 

Gert Gremmen

-----------------------------------------------------

 

Openstreetmap.nl  (alias: cetest)

P Before printing, think about the environment. 

 

 

Van: talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org
[mailto:talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org] Namens Pieren
Verzonden: Friday, December 17, 2010 12:27 PM
Aan: Richard Fairhurst
CC: talk at openstreetmap.org
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk] Massive import of airports

 

On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Richard Fairhurst <
richard at systemed.net> wrote:


The legal discussion makes only sense if the import is going to be
accepted. And since it is not the first import about airports in OSM,
this one will create more troubles than anything else. I agree with
Frederik that it should be reverted. It's not because some geodata can
be downloaded (freely or not) from somewhere that they can stupidly
imported in OSM without any regards about existing data. Such things
were possible 4 years ago, not anymore today.


Pieren

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20101217/9cc132bd/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 5310 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20101217/9cc132bd/attachment.gif>


More information about the talk mailing list