[OSM-talk] Fwd: Nav4All navigation shut down by Navteq
waldo000000 at gmail.com
Wed Feb 3 19:40:45 GMT 2010
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Liz <edodd at billiau.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Roy Wallace wrote:
>> I suspect you will have opponents, though, because having "physical
>> characteristics that can accommodate a bike" is not verifiable.
> Actually I think it is verifiable as cycleways have design characteristics
> which provide inspiration for this ability to verify on the ground.
I don't understand, but I hope you're right - look forward to hearing
your definition (in a new thread or on the consolidation wiki page).
More information about the talk