[OSM-talk] [Talk-us] [Warning: Potential Flamewar] Clarifying Interstate Relations
chunter952 at gmail.com
Mon Feb 8 05:27:55 GMT 2010
Oh, and yes I did contact them via both the OSM Messaging system and the
WIKI's messaging system.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Chris Hunter <chunter952 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think NE2 is on any of these mailing lists. Can someone put a
> temporary ban on their account? They've been editing all day.
> On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Richard Welty <rwelty at averillpark.net>wrote:
>> On 2/7/10 9:23 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>>> What's more annoying is that he is changing the names/refs. From
>>> what I understand the ref is supposed to be only the
>>> interstate/highway number (e.g. "90" or "80") and not "I 90 (MN)". I
>>> use the ref on the relation when building maps for my Garmin to add
>>> highway shields to the map.
>> i didn't catch that. yes, the refs are supposed to be "stripped down" and
>> the name is the
>> place for detail. this changeset is definitely ill considered.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk