[OSM-talk] Thoughts on OSM design, and looking forward and back
Dermot McNally
dermotm at gmail.com
Thu Feb 25 18:04:13 GMT 2010
On 25 February 2010 17:28, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:
> Are you sure about that? How many people does it take to map the world?
> 1,000? 10,000? 100,000? 1,000,000? More than that?
>
> The more the merrier. But I'm not sure about the whole "we have to" part...
>
Alright - let's settle on "we should". In a world where we can't
define when a map is "complete", "have to" is going to be similarly
subjective.
But the answer to your second question is "more than that" - whatever
the suggested figure is.
Dermot
--
--------------------------------------
Iren sind menschlich
More information about the talk
mailing list