[OSM-talk] Thoughts on OSM design, and looking forward and back

Dermot McNally dermotm at gmail.com
Thu Feb 25 18:04:13 GMT 2010

On 25 February 2010 17:28, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:

> Are you sure about that?  How many people does it take to map the world?
> 1,000?  10,000?  100,000?  1,000,000?  More than that?
> The more the merrier.  But I'm not sure about the whole "we have to" part...

Alright - let's settle on "we should". In a world where we can't
define when a map is "complete", "have to" is going to be similarly

But the answer to your second question is "more than that" - whatever
the suggested figure is.


Iren sind menschlich

More information about the talk mailing list