[OSM-talk] Cycleways wiki doc enhanced
Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Sat Jan 2 17:46:43 GMT 2010
2010/1/2 Lester Caine <lester at lsces.co.uk>
> Provided that this does not result in REMOVING ways that are mapped - or
> prevent
> adding the REAL fine detail of ways that do not actually physically form
> part of
> the 'accompanying' road. This sort of 'shorthand' should not replace
> mapping the
> real situation on the ground ESPECIALLY where the cycleway ( or
> sidewalk/footpath ) is not physically part of the 'accompanying' road.
>
> NOTHING should dictate that removing physical data is the 'correct' way of
> mapping!
>
+1
couldn't agree more. We had the case in Germany last year that separately
mapped cycleways were deleted and cycleway=track was added to a nearby road,
that actually was physically divided from the cycleway (which btw. was also
connected to another way, the main road wasn't - a situation that applies
quite often in similar cases).
Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20100102/62244acd/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list