[OSM-talk] TAG-Suggestion: highway:trailer_shipment

Carsten Möller cmindividual at gmx.de
Sun Jan 17 13:53:01 GMT 2010


Richard Bullock schrieb:
>> A highway=steps would imply you can use your car here.
> 
> ????
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image:Steps.jpg
> You wouldn't *seriously* consider driving up or down a flight of 
> steps...surely??
> 
>> If I understood the intention correctly then highway is something you can 
>> drive on.
> 
> No. The highway key is a group of tags, some of which would imply you can 
> drive on, some you cannot. In England, a public highway could include a 
> narrow footpath through a field, where cars are forbidden and it could be 
> completely unsuitable for vehicles - up to an 8-lane motorway, where 
> pedestrians are forbidden.
> 
> The only ones I'd consider that a car could route over would be
> highway= motorway
>                 trunk
>                 primary
>                 secondary
>                 tertiary
>                 unclassified
>                 service

+ corresponding _link(s)

> With the possible addition of
>                 track or byway as a last resort

Maybe there is sth. wrong in my dictionary.
Sorry if so. The word highway itself seems the problem.
But it's not my intention to change things here.
We already have highway=pedestrian. That's satisfactory.
As I said before. I'm trying to combine pgrouting and OSM in a private 
project. I mentioned the need to keep things simple. The handling of 
some tags overloads the data and the complexity for parsing a suitable 
routing table. For my taste even the turning restrictions could be 
handled simpler. But that doesn't matter. Parsing this out is simple.





More information about the talk mailing list