[OSM-talk] Using editors to indicate license preference.

[Anthony]

On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:24 AM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com>wrote:

> 2010/1/18 Anthony <osm at inbox.org>:
> > I didn't say it's invalid so much as it's redundant.
> >
> > All contributions are effectively PD anyway.
>
> That still isn't the point, people want to produce PD data that is
> readily accessible to all, not PD data shrink wraped with another
> license.
>

So one person needs to anonymously download everything from OSM and put it
up on another website which doesn't have the ODbL on it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20100117/4db333ea/attachment.html>