[OSM-talk] USGS map areas with street names
Karl Guggisberg
karl.guggisberg at guggis.ch
Tue Jan 26 00:00:08 GMT 2010
I wrote (guessed) part of what is on the wiki because there was just
this list of PDF documents and no furthern info. I'm looking for
confirmations/corrections from people who are actually involved in
producing these maps. Discussion was to complete OSM data from the USGS
maps but the way it looks now it doesn't make a lot of senset to me. And
no, I didn't find any name I could have completed when I had a closer
look at three samples areas.
Should we simply remove the whole section from the wiki?
-- Karl
Am 25.01.2010 21:31, schrieb Brad Neuhauser:
> Is the whole thing on the wiki just wrong? I haven't looked
> extensively, but the street names appear to match up. This would make
> sense as the map says "Street data courtesy openstreetmap.org
> <http://openstreetmap.org>" If there were any other data, it would
> probably be from MINUSTAH, but that's already mentioned on the OSM
> Street Names page. Has anyone seen a specific example of where the
> USGS maps have more street data than OSM?
>
> Brad
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Adrian Brain
> <adrianpbrain at yahoo.co.uk <mailto:adrianpbrain at yahoo.co.uk>> wrote:
>
> Hi Karl,
>
> I had trouble understanding what these were too. The pdf's are
> from Delta State University (here
> <http://edcftp.cr.usgs.gov/pub/data/disaster/201001_Earthquake_Haiti/data/map_products/MISSISSIPPI_DELTA_STATE_MAPS/Haiti_25Kand6Kcombo_lettersize_GeopdfimageAtlas_vDSU20100119/>)
> and represent the difference between the road names on the USGS
> maps and the road names on osm.
>
> Names present on the USGS maps but NOT in osm are highlighted in
> black.
>
> That is very useful, but there are roughly ninety docs with twenty
> (image) pages in each giving 1800 separate comparisons to be made.
> Also, updates will have been made to osm, from other sources,
> since the extract. So if a name is in black in the pdf but now
> present in osm that still does not indicate whether that area has
> been done or not.
>
> (And that doesn't include the work of actually putting names into
> osm when they are found)
>
> As each pdf is done it needs to be commented as such.
>
> I'm happy to start on the job but want to wait for some time in
> case anyone has already done some of the work. We can't afford to
> do such large amounts of work twice if we can avoid it. It would
> make sense to work outwards from PaP but it is the towns where the
> comparison is most laborious/time-consuming.
>
> Regards,
> Adrian.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On *Mon, 25/1/10, Karl Guggisberg /<karl.guggisberg at guggis.ch
> <mailto:karl.guggisberg at guggis.ch>>/* wrote:
>
>
> From: Karl Guggisberg <karl.guggisberg at guggis.ch
> <mailto:karl.guggisberg at guggis.ch>>
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] USGS map areas with street names
> To: talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk at openstreetmap.org>
> Date: Monday, 25 January, 2010, 17:34
>
>
> Hi Adrian
>
> I also had a look at these maps and I still don't understand
> completely how they relate to OSM. The map already displays
> the OSMs road network, but where do the street names in the
> USGS map come from? They aren't taken from OSM, are they? Are
> there indeed two road networks in the USGS map, one in maroon
> (from OSM) and one from an unknown source (in black)?
>
> For my taste, navigation in the PDF atlas is too complicated
> (for mappers, people in the field may find it useful) and
> comparing the street names manually with names displayed on a
> slippymap in another instance is way too complicated too. Are
> the USGS maps available as tiles served by a WMS server?
>
> Regards
> Karl
>
> Am 25.01.2010 18:13, schrieb Adrian Brain:
>> Wiki page
>>
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Haiti/Street_names
>>
>> contains a section called "USGS map areas with street names"
>> which contains a list of pdf's with osm data overlain on USGS
>> imagery with streetnames missing from osm at the time of
>> preparation highlighted - these need adding to osm.
>>
>> There is nothing to indicate in the wiki which, if any, of
>> these have been looked at systematically. Checking several at
>> random has not told me which have been done and which
>> haven't, except for the last page which has the "No named
>> streets in this section" comment.
>>
>> Can anyone say which of these has been done?
>>
>> Adrian.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org <http://mc/compose?to=talk@openstreetmap.org>
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> <http://mc/compose?to=talk@openstreetmap.org>
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk at openstreetmap.org>
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20100126/0b2c566e/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list