[OSM-talk] Defining critical mass...

[John Smith]

On 14 July 2010 17:59, Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamping at googlemail.com> wrote:
> A lot of the points in this thread was already discussed by others and me
> around 2009. The whole license (change) discussion in 2009 (to my
> understanding) boiled down to: Become member of the OSMF or shut up and
> follow our judgement.

As pointed out in that thread, that's a disingenuous argument because
it's not possible for everyone interested to become a member.

It keeps getting spouted that the contributors are the most important
thing to the project, so why are the contributors getting such little
real say into the process?