[OSM-talk] What could we do to make this licences discussion more inclusive?

[John Smith]

On 17 July 2010 13:07, Michael Barabanov <michael.barabanov at gmail.com> wrote:
> Consider two cases:
>
> 1. Current license does not cover the OSM data (I think that's the OSMF
> view).  In this  case, OSMF can just change to ODBL without asking anyone.
> 2. Current license does cover the OSM data. Then there's no need to change.
>
> Where's the issue?

I made that exact point above some time ago and people umm'd and arr'd
and didn't give me a straight answer...