[OSM-talk] What could we do to make this licences discussion more inclusive?

[John Smith]

On 18 July 2010 21:43, Simon Ward <simon at bleah.co.uk> wrote:
> Is this an issue with the third (licensing/relicensing/sublicensing)
> clause?  I never fully agreed with it in the first place.

Yup, the license could be changed to a non-share alike license in
future, and some people are trying to push things toward PD/CC0
licenses.