[OSM-talk] What could we do to make this licences discussion more inclusive?

[John Smith]

On 19 July 2010 03:56, SteveC <steve at asklater.com> wrote:
> We had this discussion years ago now and they were fine with it. As with everything else, they weren't allowed by legal to say anything publicly and were just waiting for the actual changeover.

That covers current licenses, what about if OSM goes CC0/PD like some
would like and which the current CTs would allow more easily?