[OSM-talk] What could we do to make this licences discussion more inclusive?

[John Smith]

On 19 July 2010 04:11, SteveC <steve at asklater.com> wrote:
> The companies I talk to today come down in to two camps on PD. The first basically lick their lips and want us to go PD so they don't have to contribute anything (in effect make their business easier) and the second think it would be nuts because then the project wouldn't have long term growth potential and would probably die and fragment like BSD did etc etc etc.

I'm not talking about end users of the data, but companies suppling
either aerial imagery or other data, like AND for example, how would
they feel if all attribution was stripped from their contributions to
OSM?