[OSM-talk] What could we do to make this licences discussion more inclusive?

[John Smith]

On 19 July 2010 05:17, John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19 July 2010 05:12, Richard Weait <richard at weait.com> wrote:
>> Only if a later license change were to go non-SA.  An hypothetical
>> situation that you have created.
>
> I'm not the only one, since some people are already proposing to push
> a change to CC0 after the CTs are agreed to.
>

This keeps bringing up the issue of OSM's whiter than white copyright
policy, and what happens if the license does change in future to
non-share alike, do we start purging more data from the main data
base, how many times would this be acceptable before people stopped
contributing?