[OSM-talk] What could we do to make this licences discussion more inclusive?

[John Smith]

On 19 July 2010 06:18, TimSC <mapping at sheerman-chase.org.uk> wrote:
> On 18/07/10 19:39, John Smith wrote:
>>
>> On 19 July 2010 04:30, TimSC<mapping at sheerman-chase.org.uk>  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Also, if we really cared about share-alike, we would have it apply to
>>> "produced works" - that would encourage companies to give back.
>>>
>>
>> Judging by a same straw poll, very few people cared about SA extending
>> to produced works, and the ODBL has been drafted specifically to avoid
>> this.
>>
>>
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/2009-December/000753.html
>>
>> Most cared mostly about attribution and share alike on the data only.
>>
>
> It's not a question of OSMF member support, I am talking about how
> share-alike encourages business to share data with OSM.

Then why mention produced work, since ODBL and cc-by-sa both encourage
sharing the underlying data?