[OSM-talk] What could we do to make this licences discussion more inclusive?

[John Smith]

On 19 July 2010 12:35, Nathan Edgars II <neroute2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems to me that Steve's post is not just a harmless rant, but
> contains an implication, whether purposeful or not, that some mappers,
> namely stay-at-home sons (and daughters?), are less equal than others.
> Perhaps this should not merely be implied, but written out in the
> bylaws.

I think it's a bit late to be talking about bylaws, OSM-F already
exists, and there is likely to be too many self serving factions to
push through such a fundamental change as this. Just look at how hard
it is to go from one share alike license to another.