[OSM-talk] Suggestion to add SA clause to CT section 3, describing "free and open license"

[John Smith]

On 19 July 2010 20:05, Peteris Krisjanis <pecisk at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi again!
>
> I still haven't heard from SteveC or others from OSMF official answer
> wouldn't adding SA clause to section 3 in CT help situation a little -
> at least it would give contributors a promise that if there another
> license change is needed, license still will be SA (in a spirit of
> ODBL).

To be compatible with cc-by, so we can at least keep existing cc-by
data, it would need need attribution+share alike, not just share
alike...