[OSM-talk] Suggestion to add SA clause to CT section 3, describing "free and open license"
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Mon Jul 19 14:38:47 BST 2010
John,
John Smith wrote:
> I wonder if you realise the fine line you are walking here by
> employing such hard line tactics,
I am not employing hard line tactics, I am simply suggesting to go ahead
with what is on the table now.
> you are literally risking an out
> right rejection of ODBL because of this. How much time and effort will
> have been in vein exactly?
I am not suggesting to reject ODbL. I am suggesting to accept the
Contributor Terms exactly as they have been produced by the time and
effort you mention.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
More information about the talk
mailing list