[OSM-talk] Suggestion to add SA clause to CT section 3, describing "free and open license"

Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org
Mon Jul 19 14:38:47 BST 2010


John,

John Smith wrote:
> I wonder if you realise the fine line you are walking here by
> employing such hard line tactics, 

I am not employing hard line tactics, I am simply suggesting to go ahead 
with what is on the table now.

> you are literally risking an out
> right rejection of ODBL because of this. How much time and effort will
> have been in vein exactly?

I am not suggesting to reject ODbL. I am suggesting to accept the 
Contributor Terms exactly as they have been produced by the time and 
effort you mention.

Bye
Frederik

-- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"




More information about the talk mailing list