[OSM-talk] Suggestion to add SA clause to CT section 3, describing "free and open license"

[Richard Fairhurst]

Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
> Is there any actual mapper who strictly don't like SA?

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Users_whose_contributions_are_in_the_public_domain

(I reply merely to inform rather than to prolong the debate, as sticking my
head into a grinder is already seeming like an appealing alternative to
reading more of this stuff.)

cheers
Richard
-- 
View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Suggestion-to-add-SA-clause-to-CT-section-3-describing-free-and-open-license-tp5311401p5312082.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.