[OSM-talk] OSM-to-PostGIS issues

[Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio]

Hello,

Are you taking into account Windows XP's virtual memory (4 GB, I think)?

I meant 1.5 GB of physical memory.



Regards

Juan Lucas


--- On Mon, 7/19/10, Brian Quinion <openstreetmap at brian.quinion.co.uk> wrote:

From: Brian Quinion <openstreetmap at brian.quinion.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OSM-to-PostGIS issues
To: "Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio" <juan_lucas_dr at yahoo.com>
Cc: "Graham Jones" <grahamjones139 at googlemail.com>, talk at openstreetmap.org
Date: Monday, July 19, 2010, 4:47 PM

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio <juan_lucas_dr at yahoo.com> wrote:

Yes, sorry, here is the command and error message:

http://www.prodevelop.es/files/fm/public/downloads/wxp_console.png

 

Slim uses 800MB of ram as a cache by default (change with -C)

Postgresql is configured to use 256MB of shared ram plus 256MB of working memory.  

That gives you a peak usage of at least 1312MB on a 1536MB machine during index creation (it will actually be a little higher) leaving about 200MB for the entire rest of windows.


--
 Brian




      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20100719/6b532995/attachment.html>