[OSM-talk] Suggestion to add SA clause to CT section 3, describing "free and open license"

[Anthony]

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Ulf Möller <osm at ulfm.de> wrote:

> Am 19.07.2010 22:31, schrieb Anthony:
>
>
>  IIRC, the contributor terms changed significantly *after* the vote took
>> place.
>>
>
>
> http://www.osmfoundation.org/index.php?title=License/Contributor_Terms&diff=326&oldid=204


Yeah, that's as I recall it.  "and any party that receives Your Contents"
was removed, and "DbCL 1.0 for the individual contents of the database".
Both of which are huge changes.  Well, one of which is a huge change, and
the other of which was a huge question which was left up in the air.  (And
both of which I recall asking about at the time of the vote.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20100719/61cd65b1/attachment.html>