[OSM-talk] Suggestion to add SA clause to CT section 3, describing "free and open license"

[John Smith]

On 20 July 2010 19:07, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
> I don't share your sentiment that providing a license change path for the
> future actually throws away any good work. If the new license works well for

Then what do you call it when most of the data for Australia would be
incompatible, along with any other potential sources of data the
government releases under cc-by?

I would call this throwing away good work that people spent a lot of
time and effort on.