[OSM-talk] Tagging for street danger levels

Roy Wallace waldo000000 at gmail.com
Mon Jun 21 07:58:15 BST 2010


On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Cartinus <cartinus at xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
> > +1. Please map the cause of the hazard, instead of (or at least as
> > well as) a vague, subjective meta-description of a conglomeration of
> > factors. If you are having trouble tagging any of these factors, e.g.
> > traffic flow, let's discuss and fix that instead.
>
> So we are going to retag all highway=primary|secondary|tertiary|unclassified
> to highway=road and then tag the number of lanes and their width and surface
> in stead?

Not "instead", but "as well as". You can't infer lanes OR width OR
surface from highway=*. In the same way, I expect that I would not be
able to choose an informed cycle route based on someone tagging
hazard:cycle=2. I'd rather know what the hazard is - high traffic,
potholes, narrow lanes, hills, etc.

If you insist, go ahead and use hazard:cycle=2 - it doesn't bother me,
and may have some use as an interim solution - but I think we should
ultimately aim for a better solution, that is, more specific
information "at least as well as" the vague information.




More information about the talk mailing list