[OSM-talk] Licence of Soviet military topographic maps

[jamesmikedupont at googlemail.com]

I am not saying that. I am saying that this is a topic for lawyers.
from what I learned about the discussion on wikipedia datapoints, it is uk
law that governs osm data.
mike

2010/6/24 Kirill Bestoujev <bestoujev at gmail.com>

> So you want to say that you do not care for those osm-users, which are
> in Russia and which may have problems using osm with copyright data in
> it? Did I get you right?
>
> K.
>
> 24 июня 2010 г. 13:56 пользователь jamesmikedupont at googlemail.com
> <jamesmikedupont at googlemail.com> написал:
> > I think you should take this to the legal list.
> > As far as I know, the copyright laws of england count for osm, not those
> of
> > russia.
> > mike
> >
> > 2010/6/24 Alexandr Zeinalov <shurik at sbin.ru>
> >>
> >> > We purchased them from this site :
> >> > http://mapstor.com/
> >>
> >> AFAIK this is not legal seller of maps, and poehali.org too. They both
> >> hosted outside Russia. So this maps can't be reliable identified as
> public
> >> domain maps.
> >>
> >> > Here the same data is available from a usaid sponsored project :
> >> > http://www.bunkertrails.org/maps.php
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > James Michael DuPont
> > Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova and Albania flossk.org
> > flossal.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > talk mailing list
> > talk at openstreetmap.org
> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> >
> >
>



-- 
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova and Albania flossk.org
flossal.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20100624/577c4b0d/attachment.html>