[OSM-talk] OSM Postgres table sizes (was: Failed to download 9.5 GB planet)

John Smith deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com
Thu Jun 24 19:44:41 BST 2010


On 25 June 2010 04:37, Richard Weait <richard at weait.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand your question.

Over time, the overhead increases, not just the amount of data.

> You can import a bounding box or extract and have smaller tables.
>
> You can import without --slim, if you have the hardware for it, and

I didn't mean without the slim option.

> lose some large tables.  But then you lose the ability to update
> unless you do a re-import.

That's my question, how to eliminate overhead in the database without
re-importing.




More information about the talk mailing list