[OSM-talk] Rendering: nature_reserve and national_park

[Richard Mann]

There probably needs to be two separate tags: one for little fenced
off areas that aren't anything else, and another for large areas that
are an overlay on other landuses. The existing tag is for small
single-purpose areas: you need another tag for the other type, not to
change the rendering of the original.

Richard

On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Vladimir Vyskocil
<vladimir.vyskocil at gmail.com> wrote:
> Here is another example : http://osm.org/go/YzUCAP8q--
> It is a nature_reserve in the sea ("Reserve Cousteau", Bouillante, Guadeloupe), we can see that it hides the "Ilets Pigeons" islands...
> I think it should not be filled or with a semi-transparent color.
>
> Vlad.
>
> On 28 juin 2010, at 20:32, yvecai wrote:
>
>> Today, the polygons tagged with leisure=nature_reserve are rendered on the slippy map in the leisure layer, thus overlapping and hiding other landuse (like 'wood' for instance: http://osm.org/go/0CAfHX7).
>> These polygons should be rendered in the misc_boundaries layer, along with boundary=national_park and with a similar transparency.
>>
>> Or maybe a tag boundary=nature_reserve would be more appropriate ?
>>
>> Yves
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>