[OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC -(amenity=ice_cream)

[John F. Eldredge]

Actually, the "theoretical" situation you described (food to be either eaten on the premises or carried out, but alcohol for on-premises consumption only) is the actual situation for restaurants here in Nashville, Tennessee, USA.  If a restaurant allows alcoholic beverages to be taken off-premises, the restaurant will lose its license to sell alcohol.  This is intended to make it harder for adults to buy beer or liquor on behalf of under-age drinkers.

-- 
John F. Eldredge -- john at jfeldredge.com
"Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 04:40:38 
To: Pieren<pieren3 at gmail.com>
Cc: <talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org>; OpenStreetMap talk mailing list<talk at openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC -(amenity=ice_cream)

2010/3/6 Pieren <pieren3 at gmail.com>:
> I like the "food:" prefix, just in case someone could interpret
> "takeaway=yes" for something else like the furnitures, dishes or the
> waitress ;-)

I know that it sounds a little bit redundant to repeat the prefix, but
in the end it will IMHO make things easier, because sooner or later
there will be overlapping features with the need to specify - or
several features with different attributes and it will not be clear
which one is for which feature (already happening right now). E.g.
there could be a restaurant which at the same time sells ice_cream to
take away but beer just for consumation inhouse (e.g. for legal
reasons).

cheers,
Martin

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk at openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk