[OSM-talk] Boundary relation with >5000 members?
sylvain letuffe
liste at letuffe.org
Sun Mar 28 21:52:21 BST 2010
Hi,
Julio Costa Zambelli wrote:
>
> It seams reasonable to surround the pieces of land under some local
> government jurisdiction (...)
>
I do agree with you. In France, we even created a relation to represent land
boundaries and another one with territorial waters.
Julio Costa Zambelli wrote:
>
> If it is not the "right" way to do it or there is a better way to do it,
> please let me know.
>
I think the idea is ok in concept, however it faces a few technical problems
:
- you reach easily the API max members limit
(Raising it is not an option for performance reasons)
- Even manipulation of such relations under 2000 members is a hard work with
traditional editors
Here are my views on an hypotetical solution :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/boundary_segment
And what we did in france :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/France_boundary_pyramidal_construction
--
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Boundary-relation-with-5000-members-tp4813529p4814756.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the talk
mailing list