[OSM-talk] OSM composer not open source?

[John Smith]

On 1 May 2010 18:27, jamesmikedupont at googlemail.com
<jamesmikedupont at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Please don't get to personal here, it is not about my morals. It is
> about consistency and clarity.

There isn't much I can do about the truth offending you, you did
indeed use emotive language to push an agenda based on your morals.

> I just find it confusing. Really there is no clarity in this example,
> as to the rights of the user. What is the exact license of the
> software? What is the agreement that you enter into by downloading? I
> would say that it is not clear.

What does software license ambiguities have to do with the OSM wiki?