[OSM-talk] Changeset 6234414

[vitor]

It seems to be a new user from Brazil trying to upload a .dwg without much
knowledge. I´ll try to contact him.

On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Barnett, Phillip
<PHILLIP.BARNETT at itn.co.uk>wrote:

> It's located at 0,0 so is obviously incorrect (at least to a first casual
> look) ie, whatever the user was intending to map, he's accidentally dumped
> it in the wrong place.
>
>
>
>
> PHILLIP BARNETT
> SERVER MANAGER
>
> 200 GRAY'S INN ROAD
> LONDON
> WC1X 8XZ
> UNITED KINGDOM
> T +44 (0)20 7430 4474
> F
> E PHILLIP.BARNETT at ITN.CO.UK
> http://WWW.ITN.CO.UK
> P  Please consider the environment. Do you really need to print this email?
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org [mailto:
> talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Toby Murray
> Sent: 09 November 2010 06:04
> To: talk at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Changeset 6234414
>
> Look at the shape of the ways:
> http://imgur.com/47kmj.png
>
> Now look at the area that the same user edited in their next few
> changesets. For example:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?minlon=-49.3501728&minlat=-25.5176786&maxlon=-49.3216498&maxlat=-25.466278&box=yes
>
> I'm not sure what they were trying to do but it looks like they used
> the wrong projection when converting from their source to OSM so
> everything got shifted. The user should probably be contacted. Anyone
> speak Portugese?
>
> But at the end of the day I'm guessing this changeset needs to be reverted.
>
> Toby
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:17 PM, MP <singularita at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Does anybody have idea what it is? Seems to be large lot of untagged
> lines
> > in middle of the ocean and I don't see what it could be (coral reefs?
> some
> > under-sea features?).
> >
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6234414
> >
> > What should be done with similar uploads, if the ways are untagged and it
> is
> > not very clear what they should be?
> >
> > Google translate told the summary is "map made in autocad and being
> passed
> > on to the OSM" which isn't very explanatory about source and purpose of
> the
> > data.
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > talk mailing list
> > talk at openstreetmap.org
> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
> Please Note:
>
> Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Independent Television News Limited unless specifically
> stated. This email and any files attached are confidential and intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify
> postmaster at itn.co.uk
>
> Please note that to ensure regulatory compliance and for the protection of
> our clients and business, we may monitor and read messages sent to and from
> our systems.
>
> Thank You.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20101109/ab5ee2c3/attachment-0001.html>