[OSM-talk] Suggestion for an Unconference

[Emilie Laffray]

On 24 November 2010 18:20, Peter Wendorff <wendorff at uni-paderborn.de> wrote:

> Dangerous question.
> On the one hand you are right: It would be awesome.
> But on the other OSM should not be as a big companies wants it to be.
>

I agree with the statement that OSM should be what OSM wants to be. If the
goal of OSM coincides with those companies, good, else we should not move
out of our way to serve those companies interest.

Emily Laffray
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20101124/96d8c44d/attachment.html>