[OSM-talk] Suggestion for an Unconference

[Richard Fairhurst]

[follow-ups to legal-talk please]

David Murn wrote:
> I have no interest in the legal detail of the licence, only 
> interested in talking about the ramifications of the licence 
> on our map data, no matter how many times people try 
> to derail this important issue to a legal mailing list.

It is nothing to do with "derailing".

The tagging@ list is there for discussions of how tagging impacts on our map
data. No-one is saying that tagging isn't important: it's just a big subject
that some people have chosen not to be interested in.

The legal-talk@ list is there for discussions of how legal matters impact on
our map data. No-one is saying that legal matters aren't important: they're
just a big subject that some people have chosen not to be interested in.

Please have some respect for your fellow mappers, and let _them_ choose what
they're interested in by subscribing to the right list; don't try and tell
them what they should be interested in by posting everything to talk@
regardless.

cheers
Richard


-- 
View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Suggestion-for-an-Unconference-tp5768507p5773851.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.