[OSM-talk] Suggestion for an Unconference

[Simon Ward]

On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 06:22:26AM +1100, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
> You forgot to say that "talk" is for matters that mappers wish to
> discuss with the whole community.
> Perhaps you could respect this and stop hiding stuff which is important
> on legal-talk where there are fewer subscribers than on talk.

Not that the whole community reads talk anyway, but…

I hereby notify the whole community (on talk) that there is a plethora
of mailing lists covering various topics, listed at the following
places:

http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mailing_lists

There, now the whole community (on talk) should be aware of the lists.

Any posting of topics specifically covered by a list is now not only
arrogant, but demeaning to the whole community (on talk) in that they
are assumed to be incapable of subscribing to another list and choosing
what subjects to listen to.

Simon
-- 
A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a
simple system that works.—John Gall
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20101126/a9b87691/attachment-0001.pgp>