[OSM-talk] Suggestion for an Unconference
john whelan
jwhelan0112 at gmail.com
Fri Nov 26 23:09:08 GMT 2010
This is a fun one. CANVEC has address ranges for some Canadian provinces.
Locally after I imported the address ranges I found the missing streets
because you just have the two address lines with no road in the middle.
Working with others such as CANVEC does provide a method of cross checking
for the data and in this case improves the accuracy of the map. It also has
enabled people to fill in the basic map for some very remote locations.
What CANVEC isn't so strong at is detail on point of interests such as
restricted junctions or where there are traffic signals so OSM with imported
data gives a very good blend.
Cheerio John
On 26 November 2010 16:51, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 4:36 PM, SteveC <steve at asklater.com> wrote:
> > Have a look at commercial data and OSM and do a diff, what are the main
> things missing?
>
> The main thing missing is consistency. You'll often find a highly
> detailed section of map right next to a much more sparsely detailed
> section. With commercial data, this tends to happen only at
> jurisdictional boundaries.
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20101126/f839ea13/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list