[OSM-talk] [OSM-legal-talk] In what direction should OSM go?
Nathan Edgars II
neroute2 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 1 03:47:12 BST 2010
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Nathan Edgars II <neroute2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:
>>> I think it's pretty obvious that my property boundary can be surveyed.
>>> I have a survey of it!
>>
>> So is your point that everything (relatively permanent and worth
>> mapping?) can be surveyed, and thus there's no reason to have a
>> separate database that gets rendered together with the main OSM
>> database?
>
> No, that was not my point.
And...?
More information about the talk
mailing list