[OSM-talk] Code of Conduct Draft
Kevin Peat
kevin at kevinpeat.com
Sat Oct 16 16:44:13 BST 2010
On 16 October 2010 16:01, Serge Wroclawski <emacsen at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> That's really a technical issue: synchronizing accounts. Let's not get
> caught up in implementation details.
>
> > Anybody who doesn't like readiing postings by ...
> > just filter them.
>
> The problem with disruptive people goes beyond the individual reading the
> post.
>
> If I'm a newcommer to the project and I see widespread dissent,
> untruthes, personal attacks, etc. this will turn me off. Even if I'm
> not a newcommer, am I to now take this task on of filtering every
> person?
>
> The mailing lists aren't public in the sense of free speech. Anyone is
> allowed to say what they want using their own soapbox, but this is a
> communal space and as such, has communal rules.
>
>
So where else would people express their opinions if not on these lists? If
there is "widespread dissent" on a subject it surely means that there is a
problem that needs to be resolved not just papered over.
Kevin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20101016/61aa23bb/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list