[OSM-talk] Partnership between OSM and local government?

[John Smith]

On 22 September 2010 17:00, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
> planned license change (we don't usually go into detail unless of course
> someone requests it - we just say that OSM is committed to free and open
> licenses always).

Do they understand that may include no attribution in future?

In Australia, from what I've been told, attribution is a must and
there is no way any government body will accept anything less.