[OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday

[john whelan]

Unfortunately I some of my edits used some sources that looked fine under
the for CC-by-SA terms but on closer inspection of the ODBL terms, which was
done after I blindly followed the advice of another contributor, I am not at
all comfortable that the work would stand up legally for CC-by-ODBL terms.
I can give a date before which I was not so careful and would very much
prefer any edits done before this time to be deleted or are you saying I'm
now legally liable for the content of OSM even though I am aware some data
does not meet the ODBL terms and I have no way out of this?

Thanks John

On 14 April 2011 10:49, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> Eric Marsden wrote:
>
>>  It is not clear to me, from your message or from what I have read on
>>  the wiki, whether choosing "Decline" is a irreversible decision, or
>>  whether one would still be able later to accept the licence + CT.
>>
>
> "Decline" is reversible. "Accept" isn't. Once we've got you, we'll never
> let go.
>
> Bye
> Frederik
>
> --
> Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20110414/2f52c4ff/attachment-0001.html>