[OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday

[Grant Slater]

On 15 April 2011 13:28, john whelan <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Johnwhelan is the account name.  Unfortunately I have made a fair number of
> edits.  The concern is I'm not comfortable that all of these meet the new
> standard but I'm unsure which ones do and which don't.  I'm happy to reenter
> data  following the new guidelines.  I'm not happy to have some one else say
> don't worry about it.
>

Thanks for that. What is the answer to my second question? Where do
the potentially problem contributions come from? Email me off list if
you must.

Regards
 Grant


> Thanks John
>
> On 15 April 2011 03:55, Grant Slater <openstreetmap at firefishy.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 15 April 2011 00:38, john whelan <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>If data is "tainted" in a way that makes in incompatible with the
>> >> currently
>> >> used license then it will have to be removed in order not to put the
>> >> project
>> >> at risk (e.g. data copied from proprietary sources). This is
>> >> independent of
>> >> the license change.
>> >
>> > I assume that the currently used license means to the ODBL license now
>> > in
>> > use by contributors.  If  so how and to whom do I serve notice that even
>> > though I clicked on the accept button I'm not comfortable that all my
>> > edits
>> > before March 2011 contain only data is that is completely untainted so
>> > rather than put the OSM project at risk could they be removed.  I'm
>> > happy to
>> > get out my GPS and notepad and ensure anything I add from today forward
>> > will
>> > meet the new criteria.
>> >
>>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> What is your OSM account name? Where did the imported data come from:
>> government source, printed map, something else?
>>
>> Regards
>>  Grant
>
>