[OSM-talk] CC-BY-SA still available?

[Anthony]

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 6:10 PM, 80n <80n80n at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 7:35 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>> As far as I understand this, we would then have all the cons of
>> cc-by-sa (e.g. that some mayor mapping company could "rip us off")
>
> Show us the evidence to back up this assertion please.

It's not just without evidence, it's logically nonsensical.  If
CC-BY-SA doesn't apply to OSM, then there's no harm in using it.  If
OSM is public domain, then slapping ODbL on top of it doesn't
magically make it proprietary.