[OSM-talk] License graph

[David Murn]

On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 11:53 -0700, Steve Coast wrote:
> ...which is ignoring the 70% or so of all of those people who never 
> edited and can be switched over without incident.

That sounds like the thinking of the parties in a real vote, 'if
everyone who didnt vote, voted for us, we would have wiped the floor'
Changing that 70% doesnt have any 'incident' but they can hardly be
counted has casting their vote either way.  This means that if 30% are
active users, 3.8% means just over 12% of people have voted.

David

> On 4/18/2011 11:49 AM, Toby Murray wrote:
> >> As a side question: how many users still need to either accept or decline?
> > A lot. If you look at the two files that I am using to pull data from,
> > you will see the users_agreed.txt file has a header in it explaining
> > that there are 286,582 users that signed up before the new CT was put
> > into place for new users last year. Just under 11,000 have voted. So
> > 3.8% of those who can vote have voted.
> >
> > Toby
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > talk mailing list
> > talk at openstreetmap.org
> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk