[OSM-talk] [OSM-legal-talk] License Change View on OSM Inspector

[Jo]

If the coordinates of the new node are based on an independant source, like
Bing and if care is taken to remove tags contributed by
decliners/inaccessibles, why wouldn't it be?

Also I don't know about you, but I've been remapping ever since the license
change plugin first came out, as I resent to be adding modifications to
objects that might simply disappear in the future. So I've been spending
inordinate amounts of time in order to safeguard the time I'd have put in
to do the normal mapping.

Jo

2011/12/13 Floris Looijesteijn <osm at floris.nu>

> So now we're remapping???
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Remapping
> states you can just delete a node and add a new one to resolve a license
> issue.
> I can hardly imagine that is legally right.
>
> Greets,
> Floris Looijesteijn
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >   apologies if this is the 2nd or 3rd time you're reading this, I have
> > posted to dev and legal-talk yesterday in the hope that any major bugs
> could
> > be ironed out before I announce this to a wider audience.
> >
> > I have added a world-wide license change map to OSM Inspector:
> >
> >
> http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=wtfe&lon=-1.80469&lat=35.88371&zoom=2
> >
> > This is based on the per-object data I have on wtfe.gryph.de, combined
> with
> > a current planet file. The view is updated nightly.
> >
> > There's also statistics on the number of objects here:
> >
> > http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/munin.html
> >
> > And detailed information here:
> >
> >
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Remapping/License_Change_View_on_OSM_Inspector
> >
> > Bye
> > Frederik
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > talk mailing list
> > talk at openstreetmap.org
> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20111213/fad6183a/attachment.html>