[OSM-talk] [OSM-legal-talk] License Change View on OSM Inspector
Nathan Edgars II
neroute2 at gmail.com
Tue Dec 13 19:59:48 GMT 2011
On 12/13/2011 2:57 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/13/2011 08:47 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>> I have done many edits of this sort over the years. It has been standard
>> practice for a long time. Any tainting has already happened.
>
> I am not talking about any tainting that has happened in the past
> without people having thought about it. I am talking about any tainting
> that you, willfully, and in the full knowledge that it is problematic,
> commit (or incite others to commit) after today.
There is no difference in terms of acceptability under the ODBL+CT. Such
copying is either OK or not.
More information about the talk
mailing list